研究 降低胆固醇的他汀类药物会使患乳腺癌的风险增加一倍以上
Study: Cholesterol-Lowering Statin Drugs More than Double Breast Cancer Risk
By Dr. David Brownstein
5700万的美国人在使用他丁类降胆固醇药，美国七分之一的女性患有乳腺癌。
最新消息:自今年早些时候发表这篇文章以来，已有1000多起针对辉瑞制药公司的诉讼，辉瑞公司是他汀类药物立普妥最畅销的生产商。参见:1162起针对辉瑞公司因立普妥而造成损害的诉讼
5700万的美国人在使用他丁类降胆固醇药
为什么美国七分之一的女性患有乳腺癌? 不幸的是，医生们正忙于开化疗、手术和放疗的处方，而不是寻找许多美国妇女正遭受和死于乳腺癌的根本原因。除非我们阻止资金流向权力机构，包括美国癌症协会和科曼基金会，否则在这种可怕的疾病上永远不会取得进展。
为什么七分之一的女性患乳腺癌?其中一个原因是使用合成激素喂养动物和其他合成激素给女性，如甲羟孕酮，包括Provera。另一个原因是他汀类药物。
一项研究发现，与从不使用他汀类药物的人相比，目前使用他汀类药物10年或更长时间的人患浸润性导管癌的风险增加了83%，患浸润性小叶癌的风险增加了97%。在被诊断为高胆固醇血症的女性中，目前使用他汀类药物10年或10年以上的女性浸润性导管癌的风险增加了104%，浸润性小叶癌的风险增加了143%。
使用他汀类药物10年或10年以上的女性浸润性导管癌的风险增加了104%
事实上，在其他研究中也报道过使用他汀类药物会增加患癌症的风险。(2)在啮齿类动物中，他汀类药物已被多项研究证明会导致癌症。(2)多项研究表明，低胆固醇水平与癌症的发生有关。(3)
你们中的一些人可能会对上面的数字感到震惊。我不是。他汀类药物和癌症之间的联系很难确定，因为大多数研究都不会持续很长一段时间，而且要得到正确的诊断，癌症需要很长时间才能生长。当你看到他汀类药物的作用机制，以及由此导致的胆固醇和CoQ10的消耗，我相信长期使用他汀类药物将不可避免地增加患癌症的风险。
为什么七分之一的女性患乳腺癌?乳腺癌正影响着如此多的女性，这在很大程度上是由于传统医学对合成激素替代疗法(增加了29%的侵袭性乳腺癌风险)和他汀类药物的狂热推广。美国公众被这些有毒疗法严重欺骗和伤害。
研究他汀类药物的生化作用可以得出这样的结论:增加患癌症的风险(以及糖尿病、感染、记忆丧失、肌肉退化和其他不良影响)是可能的。更令人震惊的是，他汀类药物从未在女性和大多数男性中被证明可以预防心脏病发作和中风。他汀类药物也没有明显延长男性或女性的寿命。也许女性只需要对他汀类药物的处方说“不”。
你会做什么呢?让你自己了解药物的作用机制。寻找方法来支持身体的生物化学而不是毒化酶(这是他汀类药物的工作原理)和阻断受体。大多数药物——超过98%——通过灭活酶或阻断受体起作用。我们的设计不是为了让酶中毒或受体受阻。更多关于他汀类药物和其他药物问题的信息可以在我的书《Drugs That Don’t Work and Natural Therapies That Do, 2nd Edition. 无效的药物和有效的自然疗法》第二版中找到。
https://s.click.taobao.com/xJt8MNw
Study: Cholesterol-Lowering Statin Drugs More than Double Breast Cancer Risk
Doctor or Nurse Explaining Prescription Medicine to Attentive Se
UPDATE: Since publishing this story earlier in the year, more than 1000 lawsuits have been filed against Pfizer, manufacturer of the top-selling statin drug Lipitor. See: 1162 Lawsuits Filed Against Pfizer for Damages due to Lipitor
By Dr. David Brownstein
Why do one in seven women in the U.S. have breast cancer? Unfortunately, the Powers-That-Be are too busy prescribing chemotherapy, surgery and radiation instead of searching for the underlying reasons why so many U.S. women are suffering and dying with breast cancer. Unless we stop the flow of money to the Powers-That-Be, which includes the American Cancer Society and the Koman Foundation, there will never be progress made in this terrible illness.
Why do one in seven women have breast cancer? One reason is the use of synthetic hormones fed to animals and other synthetic hormones prescribed to women such as medroxyprogesterone including Provera. Another reason is statin medications.
A study found that current users of statins for ten years or longer had an 83% increased risk of invasive ductal carcinoma and a 97% increased risk of invasive lobular carcinoma, when compared to never-users of statins. Among women diagnosed with hypercholesterolemia, current users of statins for ten years or longer had a 104% increased risk of invasive ductal carcinoma and a 143% increased risk of invasive lobular carcinoma.(1)
In fact, the increased risk of cancer with statin use has been reported in other studies. All the cholesterol medications, older and newer ones, have been associated with an increased rate of cancer.(2) In rodents, statins have been shown to cause cancer in multiple studies. (2) Multiple studies have shown a link between low cholesterol levels and the development of cancer. (3)
Some of you may be shocked by the above numbers. I am not. The connection between statins and cancer is hard to pin down since most studies do not last for long periods of time and, to be properly diagnosed, cancer takes a long time to grow. When you look at the mechanism of action of statins, and the resultant depletion of cholesterol and CoQ10, I believe long-term statin use will inevitably lead to increased risk of cancer.
Why do one in seven women have breast cancer? Breast cancer is affecting so many women, in large part, due to conventional medicine’s rabid promotion of synthetic hormone replacement therapy (29% increased risk of invasive breast cancer) and statin medications. The American public has been terribly deceived and harmed by these toxic therapies. Studying the biochemical action of statins would lead one to conclude that an increased risk of cancer (as well as diabetes, infection, memory loss, muscle deterioration and other adverse effects) is likely. Even more appalling is the fact that statins have never been shown, in women and most men, to prevent heart attacks and strokes. Nor have statins been shown to significantly prolong a woman or a man’s life. Perhaps women just need to say “No” to a statin prescription.
What can you do? Educate yourself about the mechanism of action of a drug. Search for ways to support the body’s biochemistry instead of poisoning enzymes (this is how statins work) and blocking receptors. Most drugs–over 98%– work by poisoning enzymes or blocking receptors. We were not designed to have our enzymes poisoned or our receptors blocked. More information about the problems with statins and other drugs can be found in my book, Drugs That Don’t Work and Natural Therapies That Do, 2nd Edition.
Read the full article here: http://blog.drbrownstein.com/statins-increase-breast-cancer-by-over-200/
References
(1) Cancer Epidem. Biomarkers Prev. 22(9): 1529-37. 2013
(2) JAMA. 1.3.1996. VOl. 275, N1.
(3) QJM. Doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcr243. December 8, 2011
.png)
